Joint Utility Board Sewage Treatment Plant Outfall Relocation Project

 Find out more!                    Public input

 Detailed Reports          Frequently Asked Questions

Find out more:

  1. Background
  2. Proposed outfall location
  3. Marine routing options
  4. Land routing options
  5. Ongoing studies

1. BACKGROUND

The Joint Utility Board Sewage Treatment Plant is a hybrid secondary/tertiary treatment plant that treats wastewater from North Cowichan, Duncan, Cowichan Bay, Eagle Heights and Cowichan Tribes (the CVRD Central Sector Area). The Plant is located on Cowichan Tribes’ land near Duncan. It is operated by the District of North Cowichan and discharges highly treated effluent (cleaned water) into the Cowichan River. While this effluent meets provincial swimming safety standards, it is not clean enough for drinking.  

We are working to move the outfall to a new location at the edge of Cowichan Bay.

There are several reasons to relocate the outfall:

  • The treatment plant is on land leased from Cowichan Tribes. The lease agreement includes a commitment to make a reasonable effort to move the outfall from the Cowichan River.
  • During periods of very low river flow, there is not enough flow to provide the desired amount of effluent dilution. Low river flows are expected to become more frequent in the future.
  • The existing outfall infrastructure is at risk of damage from log jams and gravel accumulation.
  • Moving the outfall from the river may trigger a reassessment of shellfish harvesting in Cowichan Bay.

2. PROPOSED OUTFALL LOCATION

Studies and public engagement in 2015 identified a proposed outfall location in Cowichan Bay (see map, Stage 1 outfall). Since that time, additional studies and consultations with local First Nations have led to a new proposed location at the edge of Cowichan Bay (see map, Stage 2 outfall).

The outfall location has been selected to avoid anchorages and known shellfish harvesting areas. There will be significant dilution of the effluent at this location, much more than with the existing outfall. Modelling shows that the discharge will meet federal and provincial standards, even with increased quantities of effluent as the population grows.

Additional monitoring, before and after the outfall is operational, will take place through a Receiving Environment Monitoring Program.

Work is now underway to determine the preferred route for the pipe that will carry treated effluent from the treatment plant to the outfall. This decision will be based on many factors: environmental, archaeological and cultural studies; consultation with local First Nations, engagement with stakeholder groups and the public; and assessments of the relative cost and feasibility of potential routes. 

 3. MARINE ROUTING OPTIONS

In the ocean environment, the pipe will likely rest on the sea bed. Four routes are under consideration (see map below), entering the marine environment at:

  • Westcan Terminal Road,
  • Hecate Park,
  • Sutherland Drive, or
  • Seaside Road

A detailed study provides information on the environmental implications of each of these routes. The study assessed potential impacts from pipeline construction and operation. Of the four marine routes:

  • Sutherland Drive and Seaside Road would have the least environmental impact for inter-tidal and marine environments
  • Hecate Park would have moderate impact
  • Westcan Terminal would have the highest environmental impact

Some impacts associated with marine pipelines would be temporary. During installation, possible impacts include trenching along intertidal areas (if required) and installation of anchors to secure the pipe. Other potential impacts include: disturbance, change or loss of habitat; suspended sediments; excessive noise; and fuel spills. Once a preferred marine route is selected, an environmental impact study will recommend best practices, control measures, mitigation and compensation to address any impacts associated with construction.

4. LAND ROUTING OPTIONS

Options for land from the sewage treatment plant to the marine environment are;

  • Through Cowichan Tribes lands (either via Tzouhalem Road or through the middle of the Reserve), linking to any one of the four marine access points; or
  • Along the Trans-Canada Highway and Koksilah Road to either Sutherland Drive or Seaside Road

There are also routing options through Duncan, either along the river berm or along Marchmont Road and Beech Avenue. 

Pipes will be placed underground, mostly in road rights-of-way. In some locations it may be necessary to mount the pipe on existing bridge structures. There will be disruption to traffic during installation, but there should be no long-term impacts.

 5. ONGOING STUDIES

At this time, no decisions have been made with respect to routing. Other alternatives may emerge during additional studies which North Cowichan is undertaking to identify and assess the environmental condition and risk, archaeological and cultural impacts, feasibility, cost and other considerations of land options.

Thanks for your input!

Thanks to everyone who has provided input by email, on PlaceSpeak and during the live webinar.  All of the comments (but not your names) will be included in a report on public engagement that we will prepare and post on the website. This phase of public engagement is now closed, but there will be additional opportunities as the project moves forward.

Some of your comments:

  • The longer land route (via TCH) would avoid impacts to Cowichan Tribes, be more accessible for maintenance, and have the least impact on dwellings
  • Avoid the estuary (and impacts on marine and wildlife), use one of the shorter marine routes
  • Consider the impacts of climate change and earthquakes
  • Consider the impacts of freighters (and anchors)
  • Consider cost-effectiveness
  • Improve the treatment rather than building a new pipe
  • Ensure people along the route are well notified
  • Ensure that people on septic are not paying for this or unduly burdened

View the online discussion:

The window for comments has now closed, but you can still connect to the topic on PlaceSpeak and view the discussion.

Learn more by watching our online "Open House" video: 

Additional Background Information and Detailed Reports

PROJECT UPDATES

STUDIES AND REPORTS

Liquid Waste Management Plan (LWMP) Amendment & Stage 1 Environmental Impact Study (EIS)
Stage 2 Environmental Impact Study (EIS)

 PRESENTATIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the outfall moving? Whose sewage is it? How much will the project cost?

Find the answers to your frequently asked questions here: JUB Outfall Relocation Project Frequently Asked Questions [PDF - 116 KB]

Contact Us: